Map Projections

Taking the 3D Earth and displaying it on a 2D surface:
Types of projections and what we use them for.

Projected Coordinate Systems

A map projection is a transformation applied to a geographic coordinate system (GCS).

  • Converts from 3D coordinates (Lat/Lon) to 2D coordinates (meters)
  • Why does this work?
    • GCS is 3D coordinate system, but only locations on the surface of the “Earth”

Projection Methods

Three main ways to project the spheroid onto a plane.

  • Planar: A plane is referenced to “Earth’s” surface
  • Conic: A cone is referenced to “Earth’s” surface
    • Must be cut to flatten
  • Cylindrical: A cylinder is referenced to “Earth’s” surface
    • Must be cut to flatten

Projection Methods

How to reference the influences how the map is distorted.

  • Tangent: projections touch the surface at one point or line
    • Point for planar, line for conic and cylindrical
  • Secant: when projections touch the surface along two lines
    • Helps minimize reduce distortion

Only locations without distortion

Planar Projections

Planar projections are the simplest approach.

  • Limited applicability, typically used for polar regions
  • Sometimes also called azimuthal or zenith projections

Planar Projections

The Polar Azimuthal projection, tangent to the north pole.

Conic Projections

Conic projections are a great option for the mid-latitudes.

  • One central meridian

  • One or two standard parallel(s)

  • Only work for one hemisphere at a time

Conic Projections

The BC Environment Albers projection, secant to 50° N and 58° N, central meridian 126° W.

Conic Projections

Canada Lambert Conformal Conic

TopHat Question 1

A secant conic projection has one standard parallel while a tangent conic projection has two.

  • True
  • False

Cylindrical Projections

The only method that works (well) for displaying the full Earth.

Cylindrical Projections

Mercator projection: tangent to 0° N and, central meridian 0° W.

Cylindrical Projections

Transverse cylinders projections are also frequently used.

  • Minimize distortion near secant lines

Pseudocylindrical Projections

Special applications, more complex transformations.

Used less frequently, won’t be used in lab.


TopHat Question 2

Which of the these methods for projecting spatial data are best for global scale maps?

  • Cylindrical
  • Conic
  • Planar
  • Azimuthal

Types of Deformations

All map projections must induce distortions in order to display the 3D earth in 2D, they can cause different distortions in different ways:

  • Tearing: All projections have tearing (edges)
  • Shearing: Shapes and angles are contorted
  • Compression: Changes to area
    • Bit of a misnomer, often results in expansion

Tearing

All projections require tearing, some projections have more than others.

Shearing

Shapes and angles are contorted by some, but not all projections.

  • Gall Peters is a common alternative to the Mercator

Compression

Areas can be “inflated” or “deflated” some, but not all projections.

  • Serious issues when you calculate statistics dependent upon area!
  • Population density is a good example
    • You will get experience with this in Lab

Compression

Areas can be “inflated” or “deflated” some, but not all projections.

  • Serious issues when you calculate statistics dependent upon area!
  • Population density is a good example
    • You will get experience with this in Lab

Types of Projections

Different types of projections that are designed to preserve some attributes.

  • Conformal: Shapes and angles are preserved, i.e. they prevent shearing

  • Equal-area: Areas is preserved, i.e. they prevent compression

  • Equidistant & True-direction: Less common

  • Compromise: Splits the difference for aesthetics

Conformal Projections

Designed to maintain the shapes/angles across the map.

  • Mercator is a good example
    • It maintains shape/angles, useful for navigation
    • To maintain shape globally, it must severely distort area
    • Scale changes across map, bad for measuring distance/area

Conformal Projections

Designed to maintain the shapes/angles across the map.

  • Lambert Conformal Conic
    • Area distortions are less drastic
      • A conic projection using secant lines
    • However, the area calculations are not true to reality

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)

Globe is divided into 60 strips 6° wide, spanning 80°N to 80°S.

  • Special type of conformal projection
    • Only used for “small” areas
    • Minimal distortion within zones

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)

Globe is divided into 60 strips 6° wide, spanning 80°N to 80°S.

  • Special type of conformal projection
    • Only used for “small” areas
    • Minimal distortion within zones

UTM Zones

Vancouver is in UTM Zone 10N.

Mackenzie Delta, UTM Zone 8N

Equal Area Projections

Designed to preserves area, useful where area must be preserved for land surface analysis.

  • Gall Peters projection
    • Maintains area, can be used to calculate population density
    • Angles & shapes are deformed so it “looks” weird

Equal Area Projections

Designed to preserves area, useful where area must be preserved for land surface analysis.

  • The Albers equal area
    • Shape distortions are less drastic
      • A conic projection using secant lines
    • Still visible, especially in the north

Equidistant/True-Direction Projections

Designed to preserves distance/direction.

  • Cannot be preserved globally, only specific locations
    • e.g. lines radiating from center of an azimuthal projection
    • Gives a “great circle” route
      • Shortest line between two locations

Equidistant/True-Direction Projections

Designed to preserves distance/direction.

  • Cannot be preserved globally, only specific locations
    • e.g. lines radiating from center of an azimuthal projection
    • Gives a “great circle” route
      • Shortest line between two locations

Compromise Projections

These projections are designed for aesthetics.

Minimize distortion without preserving any one property.

TopHat Question 3

A conformal projection will maintain which properties? (select all that apply)

  • Area
  • Shape
  • Distance
  • Angles
  • Direction
  • All of the above
  • None of the above

What projection is right for my map?

There isn’t a “correct” answer, but there are wrong answers.

  • Typically get similar results with a handful of projections, depending on application
  • Best practice is to always use an equal area projection to calculate areas/densities
    • Many different equal area projections

Things to Think About

Where are the data from?

  • Some organizations use a standard projection
    • Stats Canada: Lambert Conformal Conic
    • British Columbia: BC Environment Albers

What is the map’s purpose?

  • Conformal/compromise are aesthetically pleasing.
  • Navigational maps, use conformal, equidistant, etc.
  • Thematic maps (areas/densities) use equal area.

Map Scale

Relationship between distance on a map to distance in the real world.

  • How much smaller is a unit on the map than a unit on the earth?
    • i.e. 1 cm on the map = 1 km on the Earth
  • Graphic, verbal, or representative fraction

Map Scale

Small Scale: Zoomed out, large area, more general, less detail.

Large Scale: Zoomed in, small area, more detail, less general.

Map Scale

Small Scale 1:10,000,000
1/10,000,000 = 0.0000001

Large Scale 1:1,000
1/1,000 = 0.001

Map Scale

All maps require simplification of real world features. The degree of simplification is a function of the scale.

  • Smaller scale maps require more generalization.
  • Larger scale maps can include more detail.

Map Scale & Projection

Map scale will impact our choice of projection.

  • Projections that work at 1:1000 may not work at 1:10,000,000
  • Conformal projections (e.g., Mercator), scale changes with position on the map
    • Preserved locally; distorted globally

TopHat Question 4

A large scale map shows a _____ area of the earth and small scale map shows a _____ area of the earth.

TopHat Question 5

On a scale of 1 to 5: How do you feel about the lecture topics covered in Module 2 (Steps of Abstraction & Map Projections)?

  • 1 = It makes no sense at all.

  • 3 = Unsure.

  • 5 = I makes perfect sense.

  • Participation points only, please answer honestly

TopHat Question 6

Are there any topics from Module 1 or Module 2 which you would like me to discuss further before moving on to Module 3?

  • If not, just say No

  • If yes, please keep your response short. List a few concepts you find particularly confusing, separated by a comma

  • Participation points only, please answer honestly