Spatial data has special properties that we must take into consideration
“Everything is related to everything else,
but near things are more related than distant things.”
-Waldo Tobler
This might seem obvious:
Not a grantee of similarity.
What do you have in common with your neighbor?
Everything is related to everything else, but …
Even distribution of discrete objects trough space, or values (qualitative or quantitative) across a continuous field.
Uneven distribution of discrete objects trough space, or variation of values (qualitative or quantitative) across a continuous field.
A measure of similarity Homogeneity/heterogeneity.
These phenomena tend to exhibit a high degree of spatial autocorrelation (select all that apply)
Map scale: ratio of map units to real world units.
Time is “one dimensional”, but many of the same concepts related to scale apply.
Different phenomena operate on different temporal and spatial scales.
Different phenomena operate on different temporal and spatial scales.
Tobler’s First Law of Geography applies to time just as it applies to space.
As a model of a complex system becomes more complete, it becomes less understandable.
We don’t need the location of every tree to map a forest.
Often, the system we want to map will exhibit high degrees of both spatial heterogeneity and autocorrelation.
We can exploit spatial autocorrelation to simplify data representation.
Relates to the level of spatial detail in a dataset.
Relates to the level of temporal detail in a dataset.
The scale of our analysis dictates our desired resolution. But data resolution can limit the scale of our analysis.
Acknowledge heterogeneity where appropriate.
Count on spatial autocorrelation
and call a unit homogeneous where appropriate.
At even smaller scales, more and more generalization is required.
Raster and vector models are distinct approaches for addressing the same task.
Spatial data models exploit spatial autocorrelation to simplify our representation of spatial features.